A pro with serious workstation needs reviews Apple’s 2013 Mac Pro


Specs at a glance: 2013 Apple Mac Pro
OS OS X 10.9.1
CPU 3.0GHz 8-core Xeon E5-1680 v2 (Turbo Boost up to 3.9GHz)
RAM 32GB 1866MHz ECC DDR3 (user-upgradeable, 64GB officially supported)
GPU Dual AMD FirePro D700
Storage 256GB PCIe SSD
Networking 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.0, dual gigabit Ethernet
Ports 4x USB 3.0, 6x Thunderbolt, HDMI, headphone jack, line out
Size 9.9 inches high, 6.6 inches in diameter (251mm x 167mm)
Weight 11 lbs (5.0 kg)
Starting price $2,999
Price as reviewed $6,499

To call Apple’s Mac Pro “anticipated” definitely qualifies as an understatement. It’s been over three years since we reviewed the last Mac Pro. For an idea of how much has changed since then:

  • It was USB 2.0
  • It was PCI Express 2.0
  • It had only SATA II internal drive connections
  • It had no Thunderbolt ports
  • I could go to the drive-in with Mary-Sue and get a bottle of Coke for five cents

I might be a little fuzzy on the last one, but the others are definitely good indicators of how badly this machine needed a refresh. The buzz around a new Mac Pro would have been high even if Apple only updated the core of this machine with the newer tech like the Xeon E5 v2 CPUs, USB 3.0, Thunderbolt, PCI Express 3.0, etc. But the contentious “Darth Pro” redesign has done what Apple wanted: created a fever-pitched chatter and air of excitement around the machine that their workstation competitors are surely envying. It’s been over three years since Apple updated the guts with anything other than a CPU speed bump, and I (and plenty of others) have been yelling “shut up and take my money” at the Apple site for a while now. On one of the nights before the Mac Pro went live on the Apple store, my girlfriend said that I was configuring build-to-order parts for the machine aloud in my sleep. I wish that was a joke.

Latest features and anticipation aside, many feared an update would never come to the Mac Pro. As Apple shifted focus to consumer-oriented products, a notoriously unsentimental and forward-looking Steve Jobs killed off high-end projects like the Shake video compositor and Xserve. Software like Final Cut Pro X launched without support for legacy projects or other much-needed features. Many feared that Apple simply lost interest in a computer that made up increasingly little of the company’s profit pie and demanded a lot of engineering resources. It seemed like Apple just didn’t care about the pros anymore and would be content to lose that blip of barely profitable market to HP, Dell, or smaller workstation makers like BOXX.

Read 145 remaining paragraphs | Comments

via Ars Technica http://ift.tt/1f4ZesH

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s